eventrundown.com
A multi-day hackathon schedule template covering kick-off, team formation, hacking sessions, mentor office hours, final submissions, presentations, and the awards ceremony.
48-hour hackathon example — 120 participants, tech campus
Day 1 — Participants arrive, grab name badges, and explore the venue setup
Day 1 — Executive sponsor welcomes participants, announces challenge themes, and explains judging criteria
Day 1 — Participants pitch their ideas in 30 seconds, teams self-organize around preferred challenges
Day 1 — Official start of the build window — teams begin planning, scoping, and coding
Day 1 — Catered dinner for all participants — working tables stay open throughout
Day 1 — Industry mentors available for 15-minute team consultations — sign-up sheets at mentor tables
Teams know exactly when submissions close, when mentors are available, and when presentations begin — no surprises.
Dedicated mentor office hours prevent one team from monopolizing all the expert access during the event.
Scheduled food and rest prevents burnout during the overnight stretch — keeps teams sharp for demo day.
Corporate Innovation Hackathons
Internal events where employees build solutions to company challenges
University & Student Hackathons
Collegiate coding competitions with sponsor prizes and recruiting components
Startup Weekend Events
54-hour programs where participants build and pitch a startup from scratch
AI & ML Buildathons
Focused AI hackathons with model evaluation and technical judging criteria
Professional workshop and conference timeline
Professional photoshoot timeline from setup to wrap
Speaker-facing schedule for summits with mic checks, stage cues, and Q&A
Company-wide meeting with exec updates, Q&A, and team recognition
Use the hackathon template above or describe your event to get a custom multi-day schedule in seconds.
DescribeRevealing the challenge theme at the opening ceremony levels the playing field and creates an energetic moment that kicks off the build period.
Larger teams create coordination overhead that slows execution. Smaller teams move faster and produce more cohesive projects.
At the 24-hour mark, have each team share where they are in 60 seconds. Struggling teams can get mentor support before it's too late to pivot.
Late submissions create fairness issues and delay the judging timeline. Communicate the hard cutoff early and often — then hold to it.
Publish the judging rubric before the event starts. Teams build better projects when they know how they'll be evaluated — innovation, feasibility, and presentation.
24-hour hackathons are the classic format and create the most intense creative pressure that participants find energizing. 48-hour hackathons give more time for polish but require better logistics around sleeping arrangements and participant stamina. For corporate or beginner hackathons, 8–12 hours in a single day is a great starting format that lowers the commitment barrier and still produces solid projects.
Teams of 3–5 people are the standard for most hackathons. Teams smaller than 3 struggle to cover design, development, and presentation. Teams larger than 5 tend to have coordination overhead that slows them down. Set a maximum team size in your rules and communicate it clearly at registration to prevent last-minute reshuffling.
Make mentors available in waves rather than continuously — active mentor office hours from hours 2–6 and 10–14 in a 24-hour hackathon covers the most critical building phases. Teams need the early hours to ideate without interference, and late-stage mentoring helps with presentation refinement. Post mentor schedules and expertise areas so teams know who to seek out for specific needs.
Use a standardized rubric published before the event with weighted categories (e.g., innovation 30%, technical execution 30%, impact 20%, presentation 20%). Assign each team the same presentation time — typically 3–5 minutes plus 2 minutes of questions. Use a panel of 3–5 judges with diverse backgrounds, have them score independently before discussing, and average scores to minimize individual bias.